Method: Data included interviews, a survey of comments in print media, the examination of the HANZ website, and the Ministry of Health records of publicans prosecuted. Data was also used from a repeat survey of 255 bar managers in November 2004, May 2005, and November 2005, and from three surveys of observed smoking in bars.

Results:

The issues mentioned by sector interviewees largely concerned new costs, lost revenue, and the definition and management of outdoor areas where smoking could occur. There was little comment by interviewees on the enforcement of smokefree policies. Indirect evidence of the experience of hospitality staff is given by the very low survey observations of smoking in bars, (one patron in 10836 people observed). Surveyed bar managers showed a change from 44% approval of smokefree bars in November 2004, to 60% approval in November 2005.

Some interviewees showed low knowledge of the risks from secondhand smoke, and a low regard for the right to work in a smokefree environment.

Conclusions: The beliefs of some bar owners and managers about secondhand smoke and worker safety continue conflict with official and public health positions.

Implications: Crucial stakeholder groups may need particular information campaigns before the introduction of smokefree policies.