Thursday, 6 September 2007 - 2:50 PM
251

Smoking cessation care in hospitals: an intervention trial to increase routine care

Megan Freund1, Elizabeth Campbell2, Christine L. Paul, PhD3, Rebecca Sakrouge2, Jenny Knight, MMedSci(HP)4, John Wiggers, PhD4, Raoul A. Walsh, PhD3, Therese Jones5, and Afaf Girgis, PhD3. (1) School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Longworth Avenue, Newcastle, Australia, (2) Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New Area Health Service, Longworth Avenue, Wallsend, 2287, (3) Centre for Health Research & Psycho-oncology, The Cancer Council NSW, University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, Locked mail bag 10, Wallsend, 2287, Australia, (4) Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, (5) Greater Western Area Health Service, Bathurst

Background: Intervention with hospital patients who smoke can potentially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with tobacco. Limited data has described interventions to increase the provision of such care

Method: A study, involving two intervention and two control hospitals, investigated whether a 12-month multi-strategic intervention increased smoking care provision to nicotine dependent inpatients. Intervention strategies included local adaptation, linking into existing processes, training, compliance monitoring and prompts.

Patient surveys (274-347 per experimental condition), medical notes audits (181-228) and staff surveys (229-302) were used to collect outcome data at baseline and follow-up using. Care practices evaluated included: assessment of smoking status; management of withdrawal symptoms; offer and provision of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and; linking patients to assistance post-discharge.

Results: A consistent, large, intervention effect was found for the offer and provision of NRT across all three methods of data collection. For example, intervention patient reported offer of NRT increased 34%, from 17% to 51%. Variable intervention effect, across the data collection methods, was found for the other care practices.

Conclusions: Delivery of a multi-strategic intervention is effective in increasing smoking care delivery in hospitals, particularly the provision of NRT.

Implications: Future research should aim to further increase the provision of NRT to hospitalised patients and also focus on methods to increase other aspects of smoking, particularly care related to discharge. This study indicated intensive approaches to guideline dissemination can be effective. Such an approach is required if the intended population health outcomes are to be realised.